Look at the “Why Say Yes / Why Say No” section of the article. Consider which side you agree more with. Were there other details
in the article that could be considered pros and cons? Identify one more pro and one con from the rest of the article and add each to the list. Which side do you think is more persuasive? Explain your position. Your answer should be one paragraph. Submit your response in the box below. (ALSO I DIDN'T GET ANY "rest of the article" STUFF)
I think that the no side was more persuasive. It has been proven that GMO's could cause allergic responses and can could cause undesired toxicity. GMO's could also cause side affects like toxicity, organ damage and gene transfer. Organic or uncontaminated, pesticide free fruit do not have any fertilizers solvents or additives. In the article the no side said rot free tomatoes are no longer being engineered because they started containing carcinogens, a cancer causing substance. This is why I say no to GMO.
Answer: Humans in my opinion are curious about everything, we need to know everything about our reality to feel safe. this is why we are so intrigued to find and know everything about every animals.
