Look at the “Why Say Yes / Why Say No” section of the article. Consider which side you agree more with. Were there other details
in the article that could be considered pros and cons? Identify one more pro and one con from the rest of the article and add each to the list. Which side do you think is more persuasive? Explain your position. Your answer should be one paragraph. Submit your response in the box below. (ALSO I DIDN'T GET ANY "rest of the article" STUFF)
I think that the no side was more persuasive. It has been proven that GMO's could cause allergic responses and can could cause undesired toxicity. GMO's could also cause side affects like toxicity, organ damage and gene transfer. Organic or uncontaminated, pesticide free fruit do not have any fertilizers solvents or additives. In the article the no side said rot free tomatoes are no longer being engineered because they started containing carcinogens, a cancer causing substance. This is why I say no to GMO.
Dear Diary, The adults are starting to get restless up here in this attic. Anne is bored and Margot does a lot of schoolwork. There is a lot of fighting. Anne and Mrs. Frank, Mom and Dad, and even Mr. Frank and Mrs. Van Daan. I hope this war ends soon. We are running out of food and we can't keep living like this.
