Answer:
Hello bozo
#karen#blessed#baddieyuh#collerthanyou#hellobozoHello bozo
#karen#blessed#baddieyuh#collerthanyou#hellobozoHello bozo
#karen#blessed#baddieyuh#collerthanyou#hellobozoHello bozo
#karen#blessed#baddieyuh#collerthanyou#hellobozoHello bozo
#karen#blessed#baddieyuh#collerthanyou#hellobozoHello bozo
#karen#blessed#baddieyuh#collerthanyou#hellobozoHello bozo
#karen#blessed#baddieyuh#collerthanyou#hellobozo
Explanation:
The answer is C, I reread the introduction over and over. Also uh the “person” you commented to is a bot who is trying to get your information.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
The techniques does Wilson use in this excerpt to convey important information to his readers is <span>Wilson uses humorous anecdotes that make the information more interesting. </span>
Annihilate and decimate both mean to destroy something or someone, but annihilate means to destroy something as a whole, and at a bigger scale, while decimate doesn't have to mean destroying the whole thing.
Eradicate and massacre are both violent words with the intent to convey destruction, but eradicate is a more general term, as massacre is meant to simple destroy/kill a large group of people.
Let's Search forn an example.
A gerund might be used like a subject n object:
Smoking is unhealthy.
And it can have an object:
Smoking cigarettes/ cigars is unhealthy.
So, yes, it's true: gerunds, like verbs, can have objects.
