Answer:
manifest; latent
Explanation:
Manifest function: In sociology, the term manifest function is defined as an intended and recognized results of a particular social pattern. In order to analyze or report the manifest function of any of the social institutions, a person needs to study its related contribution to the group's, society's, and community's continuation.
Latent function: In sociology, the term latent function is defined as a particular social pattern that is beneficial, unconscious, and unintended and possesses a positive impact on society.
In the question above, the given statement represents the manifest and latent function.
Answer:
They were encouraging settlement
<span>After the wall surrounding Jerusalem was rebuilt, the people worshiped the Lord. And according to Nehemiah 9, Levites lead the people in a confession that recalled God's faithfulness and mercy towards them in the past. They looked back on how God had always saved them despite them committing evil deeds. </span>
Answer:
Depends!
Explanation:
It depends on what part of Colonial America you were talking about. Places like New York and the Southern colonies were typically more aristocratic, where the colony was run by a small elite number of wealthy landowners. Pennsylvania was run by the Quaker oligarchs, who held a firm control over the colonial government.
The two most "democratic" societies in Colonial America were the New England colonies and in the backcountry. Local government in New England was practiced through a "Town Meeting", where residents would get together to discuss and vote on various issues. In the backcountry, where colonial authority tended to be weak, society tended to be more egalitarian, and settlers had to work together in order to stay alive and prosper.
When a person claims damages to another, this is because this person was injured as a result of a wrongful action performed by the second,which in this case, would have been not to take the correct safety measures for a donkey basketball game, in other words, the Board would have been liable of negligence.
The defense in this case should prove the Board was not negligent, as they took all reasonable and required safety measures that would have been expected for a basketball donkey game, that would prevent a person to fall off the donkey during the game and also, should prove that the tecaher could have acted in a way in wich she could have been responsible for the accident.
