Emmett Louis until became born on July 25, 1941, in Chicago. whilst Emmett, who has nicknamed Bobo, turned into an only toddler, he lived together with his mom, grandparents, and cousins in a center-class Black neighborhood in the South facet. A more youthful cousin Ollie Gordon said Emmett turned into a jokester and cherished making people giggle.
Emmett in no way knew his father, Louis till he joined the navy and changed into accused of raping two girls and killing another in Italy in global conflict II. He become accomplished in 1945 at age 23, and his military record become leaked earlier than the trial of Emmett’s killers.
In late August 1955, Emmett left his home to go to his spouse and children in the Mississippi Delta. on the evening of Aug. 24, after picking cotton with his cousins, Emmett went to a store for money, and leave out. which changed into a run with the aid of a white couple in their 20s, Roy and Carolyn Bryant. when Emmett went internally to buy bubble gum Ms. Bryant changed into operating alone. Emmett’s cousin Simeon Wright thirteen, and Ruthie Mae Crawford, another Black teen, stated Emmett handed the cash for the bubble gum into Ms. Bryant’s hand rather than leaving it on the counter as white Mississippians generally expected African individuals to do.
Learn more about Emmett here:-brainly.com/question/21900412
#SPJ4
Answer:
The commentary which best responds to this text evidence is:
A) This text evidence shows that storytelling in movies is tighter and smaller in scope than novels.
Explanation:
Let's highlight the part that helps us find the answer:
<em>Movies have always seemed to me a much tighter form of storytelling than novels, requiring greater compression, and in that sense </em><em>falling somewhere between the short story and the novel in scale</em><em>.”</em>
<u>This passage makes it very clear that movies are greater in scale than short stories, but smaller than novels. </u>With this information in mind, we can easily work with elimination to find our option.
<u>Option A says precisely that. It states that storytelling in movies is smaller in scope than novels, which is correct. We have already found the answer, but let's take a look at the other options.</u>
Option B says movies are more like a short story than a novel, which is not what the evidence says. Movies fall between the two genres; it is not more similar to one than the other. Option C says storytelling is similar in both movies and television, but that is completely unrelated to the evidence we are supposed to analyze. Finally, option D states movies are larger in scale than novels, which is the opposite of what the evidence supports.
Answer:
C) It incorrectly assumes that popularity equates to moral correctness.
Explanation:
A fallacy is an argument that is not correct but that might persuade people to believe it by appearing to be a good reasoning. According to this, the reasoning is fallacious in this statement because it incorrectly assumes that popularity equates to moral correctness. This is the answer because the statement indicates that as the reality is popular, it is not corrosive and decadent and this is an invalid argument because if a program is popular, this doesn't mean that it is morally correct. However, this may be an argument that people might believe.
To briefly state the author's purpose for writing the text you are analyzing
Purple.
...................
