Many historians might argue this point.... First modern war some consider was the Franco - Prussian war.
The massive amount of technology used.
Minnie balls, lever action guns, Gatling guns, trains, telegraph, air balloons.
North had more people, machines, and factories. They fought with one arm behind their back. Yale or Harvard had the row club all four years of the Civil War.
South had more mountains, but relied on other countries to supply their arms. Relied on cotton. Thought English would join for that reason. However, England found other countries to buy from.
I suggest watching the Ken Burns Civil War videos. Long but very informative.
African-American abolitionist during the Civil War.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. Vietnam." By the 20th century, Japan had already begun its political and economic expansion into East Asia. In 1910, Japan annexed to D. Vietnam
"He expanded the <span>power of the Freedmen's Bureau" would be the best option from the list, since Grant was far more interventionist when it came to the federal presence during Reconstruction in the South. </span><span />
<span>
<span>Archaeologists discovered evidence of travel between Asia and the Americas before the arrival of early humans from Siberia.
</span><em>This statement suggests that the early humans do not come from the Siberian region but from Asia. In terms of human geography, history, culture and language, Siberia belongs to Russia. And Russia belongs to both Asia and Europe. Therefore, Siberia partly belongs to Asia and partly Europe. </em>
</span><em>In reality, archaeologists did discover evidence of travel when the indigenous people of the Americas found distant genetic links common with people of Australia and Papua New Guinea with the small groups of people in the Amazonian region of South America. </em><span>
</span>
Having discovered signs of green landscapes and bodies of water is a useless evidence. It could have been there since the beginning of time. Those landscapes could be a natural landform. Therefore, this evidence would just to point to no one has ever inhabited Americas at this moment of time.
Deer and rabbits are present in Siberia, therefore, this would just point to this region evidently.
Barren lands and infertile soil would mean no one had ever settled in this place. If there was, it wouldn’t have been barren and infertile.
