Answer:
International interdependence means that countries depend on each other to get the resources that they need for their countries.
For example, Saudi Arabia’s main export is oil. Other countries don’t have deep oil wells as they do, so they import oil from Saudi Arabia.
So basically international interdependence means that countries depend on each other for their resources.
Hope this helps and pls mark me brainliest if it did :)
The fallacious arguments are:
The Civil War was about Northern businessman trying to bankrupt Southern farmers by emancipating their enslaving work force.
England developed a fair and just taxation system for the American Colonies.
<em>Both sentences have fallacious arguments.
</em>
A fallacy is a wrong idea or a belief that is not true. In the case of the question, the first sentence is a fallacy because the Civil War was not about that argument. The Union wanted to have abolishment ideas that were not supported by the Confederated States. In the case of the second sentence, that is also a fallacy. The taxation system imposed by the English was not fair. It was a heavy taxation system that upset the colonies and that was one of the reasons to start the American Revolution.
It would have to be the lives lost, and the many other lives shattered by amputations and lost minds. Casualty figures have been revised upward. The overall population was about 31,000,000, not including about 4 million slaves. Of that total, half were women, which leaves some 15,000,000 men. There couldn't have been more than 5 million adult males. Out of those, some 750,000 died from wounds or disease, with over 1,000,000 afflicted (amputations, etc.) This represented almost 20% of the adult male population, and it was worse for the South (in proportion).
<span>The Battle of Gettysburg killed over 50,000 men in three days. Three years of the Korean war resulted in about 53,000 American dead. Ten years of the Vietnam War also resulted in about 53,000 dead. The Civil War was a holocaust.</span>
