1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
galben [10]
3 years ago
6

How did conservative leaders react to nationalist movements in Europe in the nineteenth century? A. They supported the nationali

sts goal of overthrowing absolute monarchies B. They forced nationalist leaders to accept the policies of Enlightenment thinkers C. They were frightened by nationalist leaders and wanted to reduce their influence D. They supported the nationalist philosophy of emphasizing the rights of individuals
History
1 answer:
olchik [2.2K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

They were frightened by nationalist leaders and wanted to reduce their influence.

You might be interested in
What motivated the Spanish to colonize the Americas in the sixteenth century? On balance, was the Spanish arrival good or bad fo
Taya2010 [7]

Answer: good

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Part II
Neko [114]
<span>When writing an essay like this, it is important to make connections between the historical issues at hand and the current events that are shaped by these issues, such as the history of the USSR.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What were the two major issues of the 2008 presidential election?
Natalka [10]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C. Problems with paying for social security and the cost of energy" the two major issues of the 2008 presidential election are the <span>C. Problems with paying for social security and the cost of energy.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
8. How did the Roman empire support its expansion and integrate culture on three continents?
DIA [1.3K]
The answer to this question is B.)
3 0
3 years ago
A judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to let stand the decisions or actions of the other branches of governmen
Alenkinab [10]

It should be noted that a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to let stand the decisions of other government branches is known as judicial activism.

On the other hand, a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to overturn decisions or rule actions by the other branches unconstitutional, especially in an attempt to broaden individual rights and liberties, is called judicial restraint.

Judicial restraint simply means the power of judicial review to set aside government acts. On the other hand, judicial restraint simply means the refusal to strike down such acts.

Learn more about judicial review on:

brainly.com/question/4937540

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best explains how the economy affected politics in the United States in the 1930s?
    10·2 answers
  • A human made object, such as a tool, weapon, or piece of jewelry.
    15·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    6·1 answer
  • A nation with more than two major parties has a what system?
    5·2 answers
  • Which option best completes the diagram?
    6·2 answers
  • Why didn’t the Allied Powers, who knew the mass killings were taking place, focus their firepower on the ovens and the killing o
    14·1 answer
  • 1. In what time period did the earliest humans live in?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following best replaces the question mark in the graphic above?
    9·1 answer
  • Give a brief account of the life of John Locke, mentioning, in particular, those events that were most influential in shaping th
    8·1 answer
  • What is the border between Texas and Mexico?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!