Answer:
A mother’s education level has a long-lasting effect on her children. We just celebrated Mother’s Day, recognizing the long list of things mothers do for us – everything from feeding us and caring for us when we are sick, to protecting us from monsters in the closet and cheering us on at our sports events. Education might also hone the skills needed to access and effectively use the health care system. In general, infants born to more educated mothers have lower mortality rates. A new study delves into the specifics, determining on a state-by-state basis the extent to which mothers’ education levels affect their babies’ chances of survival. A mother's education level has a huge, if indirect, effect on the health of her children. Children's educational outcomes—their cognitive skills, grades, and educational attainment—are closely linked to their parents' level of education. This observation, well-supported by years of research, will come as a surprise to no one. Having better-educated parents means a higher household income, which for kids translates into attending better schools, among many other benefits.
Hope this helped you!
Explanation:
Answer:
1st Amendment
Explanation:
The 1st Amendment guarantees the freedom of speech (press/religion/right to assemble), and that the Government must not only <em>not</em> regulate the freedom to express opinions, but must also protect the opinions. This includes information on the internet.
~
Answer: I think a not sure sorry if wrong
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read the Cross of Gold speech
, by William Jennings Bryan
What evidence did Bryan give in his speech that makes you feel he is catering to the common working man?
Answer:
Bryan´s speech at the Democratic National Convention on July 8, 1896, about the party platform for the presidential election campaign, included a request for the coinage of silver as an inflationary action that would raise money circulation and helped poor people and people and farmers in debt.
Explanation:
He makes it clear that he´s committed to the common working man by claiming to represent the interests of the "humblest citizen," "the plain people of this country."
He even acknowledges wealthy businessmen as equal to farmers and miners.
Answer:
No, think that anti-federalism is better. Anti-federalism focuses on giving states their own local governments, and also having a national government. I think this is a way to make sure the country stays a democracy, and make sure laws can apply to the different climate and people of their state. A strong federal government is needed to keep the country together and protect unalienable rights, but states should be able to decide the rest.
Explanation:
