It was not a ‘British’ reaction - there was divided opinion in Britain as to how to respond and even in Parliament there were some who were in sympathy with the growing colonial resistance to British taxes. The Prime Minister was not one of them. The Stamp Act was an attempt to recover some of the great cost that the French and Indian War had incurred. The Intolerable Acts were a response to the resistance that the Stamp Act had met with. The Stamp Acts was a tax intended to revenue. The intolerable Acts were intended to curtail the growing resistance- by the time of the Intolerable Acts legislation was no longer focused on raising revenue but was focused on the resistance that trying to raise revenue had met with
The correct statements from the graph are <em>1. Voters aged 55–64 were ... </em>and <em>2. Voters aged 65 and older were ... </em>
- The graph suggests that the likelihood of the 55–64 aged group using non-traditional voting methods is 69.7 against 65.9 scored by the 45–54 age group.
- Based on the graph, the age group with the highest likelihood to use non-traditional voting methods is voters aged 65 and older with 77.7.
Thus, the graph shows that age influences voters to choose non-traditional voting methods over traditional methods.
Related link: brainly.com/question/21817767
The penal code generally refers to the criminal code. The criminal code includes crimes and there punishments. So, when someone faces the law for committing a crime, the penal code contains the penalties that they may face.
The House and the Senate each have 3 main types of votes: voice, division, and record.
Record votes are referred to as “yea and nay votes” for the Senate most of the time
Record votes in the House of Representatives normally take place by electronic device. But may sometimes use the “yea” or “nay” voting procedure.
(The Voice vote applies to the houses. For voice votes, the chair asks this win favor to respond with “Aye” and those aren’t, with “No.” before the chair announces the side that prevailed, a member may ask for a Division vote.)
Division votes are also referred to “standing votes” by the House of Representatives. Those in favor stand up and are counted by the chair and those who are sitting down are also counted, the chair then announces the results. On the other hand, division votes in the Senate are rare and instead of standing up, they simply raise their hands. The chair doesn’t announce the results in this case.
Answer:
The Brown case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education was a US Supreme Court decision that declared the separation between black and white students in public schools unconstitutional. While this was definitely the case in Brown, the NAACP (National Association for the Progress of the Black Population), founded on February 12, 1909, had been campaigning against racial segregation in the United States for nearly twenty years.
The Brown v. Board of Education may be related to the paragraph shown in the above question, which reports on passenger separation to the bus or compartment designated for the race to which it belongs, because both cases report on the separation of individuals into groups.