The legal advice that would be given here would depend on whether or not the person who accepted to purchase the shock absorber acted as an agent or broker.
<h3>Who is an agent or broker?</h3>
A broker is described as a person or organization that negotiates contracts and serves as a middleman between a buyer and a seller in exchange for a fee.
A broker is a non-party to a transaction and is distinct from an agent, who represents the primary party in a transaction.
It is important to note that the element that changes the equation is whether or not the "someone" carried out the above transaction for a fee to them.
If they did, the they may be liable to ensure that you got proper value for money. If not, then they are not liable, they were simply acting on your instruction.
Another line of recourse would be to check the warranties and guaranties given on the product that was purchased.
Learn more about agency:
brainly.com/question/23534924
#SPJ1
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because a jacket is a person property, Similar to theft, larceny is the taking of property with the intent of depriving the owner of its use. Petty or simple larceny is usually a misdemeanor and involves theft of property less than the local threshold for grand larceny, while grand larceny is typically a felony. Examples are thefts of bicycles, thefts of motor vehicle parts and accessories, shoplifting, pocket-picking. So therefore taking someone's jacket believing is your own is still larceny.
Answer:
I just did this I forgot it sorry
Explanation:
Answer:
Surpreme Court of the United States
Explanation:
If it is suspected that the District Attourny made a mistake, the next highest step in the Surpreme Court of the United States.
Answer:
Judges are expected to base their decisions on the. timing of elections, similar to other elected officials. will of the majority, similar to other elected officials. interpretation of law, independent from elected officials.
Explanation:
