If it's for a job dress nice not necessarily as nice as you did for the interview (but you can if you want too) since technically you can wear anything since it's orientation but you'd still want to make a good first impression to your co-workers so really just choose what you like and make sure your presentable.
Answer:
A. Command
Explanation:
A command economy is a system of economy where allocation of production resources of a nation is majorly determined by government of the state. In command economy, the government of the state wields the power to control the production and consumption decision of the citizens.
In Cuba, it is the government that allocates the economic resources in the state.
So Cuba`s economy could be best described as a command economy.
Explanation:
The answer is cooperative federalism
The storming stage of team development is marked by conflict and disagreement.
The storming stage is the most critical and difficult stage to pass through. It is marked by stages of disagreement and conflict among the team members due to individual personalities of group members. The overall goals and productivity of the team may decrease due to loss of energy in conflicts and arguments.
To overcome these problems the group members should communicate better to solve the surface problems. Also, regular meetings can help to discuss the team collective goals and increase the overall growth. Moreover, laying down rules can provide discipline within the group members.
To know more about storming stage refer to the link below
brainly.com/question/14287484
#SPJ4
Such tendentious revisionism may provide a useful corrective to older enthusiastic assessments, but it fails to capture a larger historical tragedy: Jacksonian Democracy was an authentic democratic movement, dedicated to powerful, at times radical, egalitarian ideals—but mainly for white men.
Socially and intellectually, the Jacksonian movement represented not the insurgency of a specific class or region but a diverse, sometimes testy national coalition. Its origins stretch back to the democratic stirrings of the American Revolution, the Antifederalists of the 1780s and 1790s, and the Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans. More directly, it arose out of the profound social and economic changes of the early nineteenth century.
Recent historians have analyzed these changes in terms of a market revolution. In the Northeast and Old Northwest, rapid transportation improvements and immigration hastened the collapse of an older yeoman and artisan economy and its replacement by cash-crop agriculture and capitalist manufacturing. In the South, the cotton boom revived a flagging plantation slave economy, which spread to occupy the best lands of the region. In the West, the seizure of lands from Native Americans and mixed-blood Hispanics opened up fresh areas for white settlement and cultivation—and for speculation.
Not everyone benefited equally from the market revolution, least of all those nonwhites for whom it was an unmitigated disaster. Jacksonianism, however, would grow directly from the tensions it generated within white society. Mortgaged farmers and an emerging proletariat in the Northeast, nonslaveholders in the South, tenants and would-be yeomen in the West—all had reasons to think that the spread of commerce and capitalism would bring not boundless opportunities but new forms of dependence. And in all sections of the country, some of the rising entrepreneurs of the market revolution suspected that older elites would block their way and shape economic development to suit themselves.
