Answer:
<h2>True </h2>
Explanation:
Langley aerodrome was an innovative but unsuccessful manned and powered machine. It was designed at the end of 19th century by Samuel Langley, secretary of Smithsonian Institution. The US Army gave 50,000 dollars for the project to build man carrying version of the aircraft. In 1898 when Langley successfully demonstrated small scale unmanned models in 1896. He coined the term aerodrome.
Langley's Aerodrome No 5. was the first successful fight of heavier-than-air , engine driven and unpiloted aircraft.
I think the answer should be A. I'm hoping.
Based on the findings of the commission, the government of Sudan is definitely guilty of:
- Genocide
- Deliberate attacks against civilians
- Torture
- Violations of international human rights
- Crimes against humanity.
<h3>What is the relationship between the government of Sudan and the Janjaweed in Darfur?</h3>
The government of Sudan and the Janjaweed are allied in inflicting humanitarian disasters in Darfur.
Officially, the Janjaweed militia is recognized as the Rapid Support Force at the command of the National Intelligence and Security Services of Sudan.
Thus, the government of Sudan is definitely guilty of all the listed crimes.
Learn more about the government of Sudan and the Janjaweed at brainly.com/question/12320503
#SPJ1
Answer: Ernest Hemingway,F. Scott Fitzgerald,Edwin Hubble that became famous
Explanation: these were a few hope this is what you were looking for
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to mention or attach the lenses that you refer to in the question. However, we can answer is general terms.
When we talk about the term "lens" in research, we are referring to a specific perspective to examine the topic at hand or the study. We can use philosophical lenses, economic, organizational, social, or psychological theories.
So we do not what lens you chose, but whatever your choice was, this lens might change how you approach researching your topic, thus affecting the historical narrative, because that particular approach is going to offer you different sources, authors, perspectives, and research lines to be followed. Your historic narrative would suffer modifications because you will have so many approaches to include in your research.
