1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimulka [17.4K]
3 years ago
7

Activation of the amygdala and activation of the prefrontal cortex have ___________ effects on aggression.

Social Studies
1 answer:
PilotLPTM [1.2K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Opposite

Explanation:

Answer to the following question is as follows:

The effects of activating the amygdala as well as the prefrontal cortex on aggressiveness are diametrically opposed. Aggressive behaviour is triggered by activation of the amygdala, whereas aggressiveness is controlled by the prefrontal cortex.

You might be interested in
Who paid for jacques cartier
nikklg [1K]
King Frances sent him to the new world in search of riches.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need one big paragraph about why duty ethics is bad ?PLEASE
gladu [14]
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>

...it is hard to believe that it could ever 

8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!!
devlian [24]

Answer:

I am pretty sure the answer is classified ads

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I<br> 7. a settlement owned and<br> ruled by a different<br> country?
natta225 [31]

Answer:

Settlements that are owned and ruled by a different country are called colonies.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Why is it important to recognize our humanity in others?
inysia [295]
It is important to recognize our humanity because without humanity, people go back to a more primitive and lawless state. Humanity is important because it helps to control society. Without humanity, people go back to a more primitive and lawless state. 
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do you think the smaller states were satisfied with government under the articles of confederation?
    9·1 answer
  • Is christianity a religion or denomination
    6·1 answer
  • In lab studies in which two participants play a game against each other, if one participant is told that the other person is goi
    12·1 answer
  • An OSHA compliance officer visited the warehouse of CAM Worldwide to conduct an inspection. The inspector found several safety v
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes what happened to Black legislators in Georgia’s General Assembly during Reconstruction?
    7·1 answer
  • Using this table and your knowledge of government choose the statement that is most correct
    7·1 answer
  • How does technology and social media affect the way people influence each other
    8·1 answer
  • Rishi, a college student, complains that he feels apprehensive and fearful most of the time but doesn't know why. Without warnin
    11·1 answer
  • What is the best way for a citizen to actively participate in their community?
    6·1 answer
  • Believing that every problem has a solution is part of which set of values?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!