<span>Native Mayan People
leave a thanks if this helps</span>
The modern evolutionary synthesis leaves unresolved some of the most fundamental, long-standing questions in evolutionary biology: What is the role of sex in evolution? How does complex adaptation evolve? How can selection operate effectively on genetic interactions? More recently, the molecular biology and genomics revolutions have raised a host of critical new questions, through empirical findings that the modern synthesis fails to explain: for example, the discovery of de novo<span> genes; the immense constructive role of transposable elements in evolution; genetic variance and biochemical activity that go far beyond what traditional natural selection can maintain; perplexing cases of molecular parallelism; and more.</span>
<span>increased from 10% in 1976 to 20% in 2006
These type of women usually choose not to have children on their own due to time (if those women choose to not have children in order to pursue a certain lifestyle or career) or genetic factors (if those women had a physiological condition where they can't have children or having one will expose them to a certain amount of risk)
</span>
Answer:
The conflict sociological perspective
Explanation:
In the conflict perspective, social relations are view as the result of the dominance of one group over the other. Marxist economic theory is an example of a conflict sociological perspective because it argues that history is the result of the relation between a dominant group and a subjugated group that conflict over scarce resources.
In the question, men are seen as a dominant group, and women as a subjugated group, thus, the social arrangement between the two groups is conflcitive, and should be questioned.
