<span>In the years leading up to World War II, Britain and France underestimated just how determined Adolf Hitler was in his lust for conquest. The failure of Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasement meant war was inevitable.
So I think your answer would be C. Britain and France took too strong of a stand against Hitler's aggression's.
If I am wrong please correct me :P
</span><span>
</span>
Law of brotherhood
The death penalty was so common, that in the First Court, the Fountain of Execution was erected, where the executioner and his assistant washed their bloody hands after cutting their heads at the victims.
Explanation:
- Since the mid-15th century, the "law of brotherhood" written by Muhammed II was in force in the Ottoman Empire. It was a "rulebook" outlining the terms of power. A brother who would gain the throne killed all other brothers and sisters, which was considered not only permissible but desirable, because it partly prevented the risk of rebellion and civil war.
- Although not always enforced, Muhammed's law led to the deaths of more than 80 Ottomans of "blue blood" over a 150-year period.
- The fountain was the most frightening symbol of the power the sultan had over his subjects.
Learn more on Ottoman Empire on
brainly.com/question/382168
brainly.com/question/977538
brainly.com/question/8047271
brainly.com/question/1463379
brainly.com/question/1502065
#learnwithBrainly
Modern warfare can create the same kind of heroes as the Spartans, however, it's less often the case that it happens though. There are many reasons for this, one important one being that modern warfare isn't reckless.
When the rise of the vernacular language in medieval Europe happened, it was disliked by the aristocrats. However, the common people were very happy because the disadvantaged people who weren't educated in Latin could finally own and read a Bible. This increased the demand of the religious works.
