I would say it is b. sates with few people wanted equal representation so that states with larger populations would not have more power.
Answer:
there ya go
Explanation:
It took Washington 36 years to become a state because each state needed a certain amount of people living there, before they could officially become a state, so ounce the amount of people living on the land we now call Washington met its goal Washington became Washington.
Hinduism.............................
The economy has been extremely stable since the recession ended ten years ago. By historical standards, the volatility of quarter-to-quarter changes in GDP is unusually low. This seems to be a repeat of the Great Moderation.
Here’s a description from my past article on the Great Moderation: “Think back to December 1982 and visualize a business leader with 25 years of experience. That executive had managed through five recessions. Now fast forward to December 2007 and visualize the next generation business leader. In that person's 25 years of experience, he or she had managed through only two recessions. Five recessions or two recessions over the course of 25 years: it makes a difference to how one perceives the world.”
The economy has ups and downs, frequently called business cycles, although the word “cycle” often connotes a regularity that the economy lacks. The volatility has calmed in the last 70 years compared to the era before World War II. It has calmed in two different ways. The frequency of recessions has dropped, and the incidence of unusually strong growth periods has dropped.
Not only were the last 70 years calm, the years from 1983 through 2007 were especially calm. So calm, in fact, that economists dubbed the era “The Great Moderation.”
Then the 2008-09 recession clobbered the economy, and economists declared the Great Moderation over. Since then, however, calm has returned. One economist said “the Great Moderation never really left. It just…treated itself to a two-year vacation.”
plz mark me as brainliest :)
The approaches of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X to the civil
rights movement differed in that "(C) King fought for desegregation, while Malcolm X supported a separate <span>identity for African-Americans," but of course Malcolm X also sought for desegregation as well. The major difference was that King only advocated a peaceful approach, while Malcolm was willing to use "any means necessary". </span>
