Can you explain what you mean by comment back ? Or do you want an explanation of what that means ?
a , a bottle of wine because it’s the only one that makes sense
<em>How should the sentence above be rewritten to correct the subject-verb agreement error? The sentence is correct as written. Tommy, in an effort to maintain clowning's positive roots, have invited dancers to weekly performance battles. Tommy invite dancers to weekly performance battles. Tommy, in an effort to maintain clowning's positive roots, invites dancers to weekly performance battles.</em>
Tommy, in an effort to maintain clowning's positive roots, invites dancers to weekly performance battles is the sentence above be rewritten to correct the subject-verb agreement error.
D) Tommy, in an effort to maintain clowning's positive roots, invites dancers to weekly performance battles.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Subject-Verb Agreement is subjects and action words must concur with each other in number (particular or plural). Along these lines, if a subject is solitary, its action word should likewise be particular; if a subject is plural, its action word should likewise be plural.
The subject-action word understanding just methods both should be particular or both should be plural. Tommy, with an end goal to keep up fooling's sure roots, welcomes artists to week after week execution fights, on the grounds that the subject is particular (Tommy), and the action word is additionally in singular structure.
Tough one! I would go with B; anyone can have opinions on anything, so there goes C as an answer. A and D are inherently the same and is the opposite of what debatable means.
