The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice "He let his party campaign for him."
In 1860<span>, </span>Lincoln<span> won the party's </span>presidential<span> nomination. In the November </span>1860 election<span>, </span>Lincoln<span> again faced Douglas, who represented the Northern faction of a heavily divided Democratic Party, as well as Breckinridge and Bell.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Established judicial review (supreme court decides what is constitutional or not)
The correct answer is Keynes.
Keynes supported free markets but as long as these were regulated by state intervention in order to soften the peaks and troughs in the business cycle. Therefore, in his opinion, the three economic questions (what to produce, how and for whom) should be answered by the economic agents in the markets, but always under the supervision of the state.
Smith was an advocate of free markets and of supressing state interventionism. On the other hand, Marx was in favour of massive intervention of the state because he considered markets to produce un unfair distribution of wealth in the states, where the richer ones exploited the poor.
The answer is going be nat tuner rebellion maybe
It was a way to have a constant supply of items like eggs or milk.
Domestication also meant the possibility of breeding animals. They didn't have to hunt if they already had them in captivity. There was no refrigeration, so keeping the animals alive ensured they would remain fresh. Skin and wool made leather and other clothing items. Manure to improve crops became readily available. Every part of an animal slaughtered was out to use. As tallow, needles, sinew/ thread, tools, glue.
Dogs/wolves helped humans hunt rather than compete.
People no longer had to migrate with the animals. They could settle and farm.
