Answer: Gambler's fallacy
Explanations: Gambler's fallacy can be simply defined as a phenomenon where the outcome of an event is viewed as less or more likely due to the outcome of previous events even though each event is independent.
For example, If a family should give birth to (5) five boys, gambler's fallacy will argue that the chance or probability of the family giving birth to girl next higher because the previous ones were boys, but in reality the chances are thesame because both gender has equally chance of being conceived.
So Miranda’s statement is a good example of gambler's fallacy because she argue that the probability that she will toss a tail in her sixth toss is higher than 50% and in reality, the probability of tossing a head or a tail are both thesame i.e 50%.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Social
Explanation:
When children hear about their races negatively, they can get discouraged to go to public areas, affecting their social development.
 
        
             
        
        
        
The neighborhood structural inequality and social disorganization fosters the development of a code of the street, or a 'might makes right mentality' that legitimizes the use of violence. This narrative is very close to the people and they identify with it more. Since the corporations want to attract people, they go with the narrative that is the most popular. The code of the street also promotes 'the survival of the fittest' and other myths. Great examples for this are ad campaigns for Nike or Supreme. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
it reserves the rights to all races
Explanation:
im a history whiz :)
 
        
             
        
        
        
The best strategy for defusing potentially harmful situations when the people involved are intoxicated is known as Distract Intervention strategy.
This is because a Distract Intervention strategy involves using a means of distraction to defuse the tension between the parties involved in the disagreement.
For example, baking a strong scream or sound will cause the potentially harmful situation to reduce or stop for a moment.
Other types of intervention strategies are Direct and Delegate.
Hence, in this case, it is c concluded that Distract Intervention best strategy for defusing potentially harmful situations when the people involved are intoxicated.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24844146