Answer:
4 and 5
Explanation:
The others are bias opinions, and just because you dont agree with the ideas, that shouldn't count.
Answer:
Type 1: (Use for facts or plan at present or in the future)
<em>+) If present simple, S + will + Vinfinitive. </em>
<em>+) If + present simple, present simple.</em>
Type 2: (Use for advice or uses when "if ..." clause is not based the actual situation)
<em>+) If + past simple, S + would + V-infinitive</em>
- If I were you, I would go to university. (Advice for present - Conditional Type 2)
- If I read too long, my eyes will usually go red. (It is about fact so we use the Type 1)
- You will not be able to go sailing with us if you get a holiday job in the summer. (It is about what will happen in the future, so that use Type 1)
- If you spoke English and French, you could work at the Council of Europe. (spoke - Past simple => Type 2, the result clause should use "would + Vinfinitive")
- You will not get the job unless you have a driving license. (It is a fact so use Type 1)
- If I go to bed early, I will normally get up early too. (It is about fact, use Type 1)
- He would study abroad if he got a grant. (got - past simple => Type 2, so that the other clause is "S + would Vinfinitive)
- If the weather doesn't change, we will not climb to the top. (It is about what will happen in the future, so that use type 1)
Answer:
Jacob Have I Loved, by Katherine Paterson, is the story of thirteen-year-old Louise Bradshaw’s coming of age on the crabbing island of Raff during World War II. When the novel opens, thirteen-year-old Louise Bradshaw spends her days crabbing on the island of Raff, where she lives her parents and twin sister, Caroline.
Explanation:
Chief Justice John Marshall (1801-1835) expanded judicial powers the most, and answers argue that his contributions to the "concept of judicial review" (one answer argued that he created the concept) and establishment of a unified court opinion led to a Supreme Court.
Answer: Read the excerpt from "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?”
Must I argue the wrongfulness of slavery? Is that a question for Republicans? Is it to be settled by the rules of logic and argumentation, as a matter beset with great difficulty, involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice, hard to be understood?
What do the rhetorical questions in the excerpt suggest?
Douglass does not want to discuss slavery further.
Slavery is a highly divisive and complicated issue.
Douglass is uncertain about slavery’s wrongfulness.
The wrongfulness of slavery should be obvious.
Explanation: the answer is The wrongfulness of slavery should be obvious.
i took the test and got 100%