We have freedom of speech to say what we would like too. But if it degrades out higher power’s then it’s technically against the law. For social justice we can only say proven facts, anything else can we classified as a act of terrorism if we speak out again the government. Exp. Dr. Martin Luther King.
Hi there!
The correct answer is D) to prevent abuse of power and tyranny by the central government. Letter D is the correct choice because it explains why the central government was given very little power - the people feared the government would abuse the power they had.
Hope this helps!! :)
<span>This was a declaration by the House of Commons of England reaffirming their right to freedom of speech in the face of King James' belief that they had no right to debate foreign policy. Many Members of Parliament were unhappy with James' foreign policy. They opposed the Spanish Match and wished for a war against Spain. The MPs believed that if they conceded that they had no right to debate matters which displeased the King, Parliament would be obsolete</span>
Answer:
what are we matching?????
Explanation:
Answer:
What I heard was that people in the science laboratory in china "accidently" let loose a virus that they were studying, which also led to that person in contact with it to go out and spread it without knowing. Causing the virus to spread across all the world within a few months.
That is my explanation! \_(ツ)_/
