1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gtnhenbr [62]
4 years ago
10

Was the Treaty of Versailles a just and fair peace treaty or an unjust and unfair one? Was it a good peace treaty for the future

or not? Write a three-paragraph essay that answers these questions. The first paragraph should be an introductory paragraph that provides some background information about the treaty. The second paragraph should answer the first question, and the third paragraph should answer the second question. Begin the second and third paragraphs with clear topic sentences and include facts to support your claims. I need help!! Thank you!!
Social Studies
2 answers:
Vitek1552 [10]4 years ago
6 0
The Treaty of Versailles was a treaty that ended WWI<span>.It ended the fighting between Germany and the Allied Powers.  It was signed on 28 June 1919. This was five years after Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated. So I would say that it was a fair treaty. BUT it was quite unfair to Germany considering that they had to accept all the blame for the war.</span>
Anna35 [415]4 years ago
3 0

Signed on June 28, 1919, the Treaty of Versailles was a peace agreement signed by European countries after the end of World War I in 1918. In this Treaty, Germany assumed responsibility for the world war, committing itself to comply a series of political, economic and military requirements.

The Treaty of Versailles can not be considered a just peace treaty, since nations have imposed all economic damage of the war on Germany. Even if that country were to blame for the war, it would be completely impracticable for a single country to bear all costs.

In this way, it is concluded that the Treaty of Versailles was not a good treaty to seal peace, since the Powers were more concerned with rewarding the material damages of war than with maintaining peace. This can be confirmed because another world war happened, with catastrophic consequences.

You might be interested in
At day care, 3-year-old sara has learned that she has to wait her turn to ride on the tricycle rather than push another child of
nikklg [1K]
She needs to be nice ok
4 0
4 years ago
How is the governor elected
denpristay [2]

In all American states, the governor is directly elected by the people.

Voters in the state usually register with one party (Republican, Democrat, or Independent), and during <u>primaries</u>, cast their vote for the candidate who will run for governorship for this party.

During the following <u>general election</u>, the winners of these primaries face the winners for the other parties.

A governor's term is 4 years, except in Vermont and New Hampshire, where it is 2 years. In most states, there is a limit of 2 consecutive terms.

6 0
3 years ago
Judicial review is the power of the American courts to Select one: a. declare a law unconstitutional. b. suspend the writ of hab
viva [34]

Answer:

a. declare a law unconstitutional.

Explanation:

Judicial review is the power of the American courts <em>to declare a law unconstitutional</em>. Judicial review is a process by which actions from the legislative or executive power can be reviewed and invalidated for violating the terms of the constitution.

3 0
4 years ago
View the activity. How do the clothes worn in ancient Briton compare with those worn in ancient Rome?
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

One of the most distinguishing articles of clothing between the Britons and the Romans were their trousers vs. tunics, respectively. The Britons' trousers, also called bracae, were often made of checkered cloth and resembled pants, while the Romans' tunics were more similar to loose-fitting dresses.

hoped this helped!

5 0
3 years ago
Explain in detail, why the Indian Removal Act was genocide?
oee [108]
<span>The Removal Act that was passed by Congress on May 28, 1830 gave the president the power to bargain in the relocation of southern Indian tribes to federal land in return for their ancestral land.  It was genocide because many Indians were forced out of their ancestral lands and many were killed by disease during their travel to federal territory.  Those who resisted were killed due to disease and many conflicts came about as some of the Indians fought back.  Among the tribes who suffered under this act were the Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, Chickasaws and Creek.  Many more died on the Trail of Tears.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Paraphrase each amendment. The Second Amendment grants the right to keep and bear arms.
    6·2 answers
  • An enlightened despot was a ruler who
    13·1 answer
  • What is consumer sovereignty? A. It is the right of consumers to lodge complaints against fraud and misconduct. B. It is the con
    7·2 answers
  • ________ is the tendency of individuals to increase their liking for something that they have worked hard or suffered to attain.
    11·1 answer
  • How do the principles of government influence the structure and function of the executive branch as established in the Constitut
    5·1 answer
  • Think about what it means to "express" something. Which powers—delegated or
    13·1 answer
  • Why does extraction rate matter in flour
    7·1 answer
  • A democratic system in which all citizens are encouraged to participate in governing is referred to as __________.
    9·1 answer
  • When did prithvi Narayan Shah get victory over makawanpur ​
    6·1 answer
  • Growing up, Noelia saw how her parents' jobs as seasonal farmworkers in California made it very difficult to get the medical car
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!