I am certain the answer is a. It sounds the most correct to me.
Bear flag Revolt
Explanation:
Known as the Bear Flag Revolt, a reference to the short-lived republic’s flag, this event was something between an American invasion and a miniature war of independence. Though the fighting was limited and the country it established lasted less than a month, the Bear Flag Revolt led directly to the American acquisition of what is now its most populous state.
A. It relied on safe houses run by northern whites and blacks to move slaves to Canada.
The reason why the trade barriers were imposed is that B. The French government would like for more French people to consume more domestic cheese and wine.
<h3>Why did the French impose those tariffs?</h3>
When tariffs and other trade barriers are imposed on imported goods, this is usually because the government wants to increase domestic consumption.
The French in this case most likely wanted to reduce imported goods so that citizens can be forced to consume domestic cheese and wine.
Find out more on trade barriers at brainly.com/question/1326741.
Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .
Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .
yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer
