I believe so if I remember correctly
This is when states become a “laboratories for Democracy”. This means that while federal law may say one thing about a certain issue/policy, there is sometimes overlap in jurisdiction that allow states to go against the Federal Government. A benefit of states being laboratories for Democracy is that they are able to implement policies that they feel is best for citizens of their respected state. A quality example of this would be the legality of marijuana. While marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, many states (colorado, california, washington, etc) have decided that the consumption of marijuana is legal for recreational use, despite federal law that prohibits it.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I would want to believe A, Ginsburg was a women's rights champion and the court's second female justice., is the answer because it explains more about the person in question, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that is.
While the other options were more about what she said or did, A in particular is talking about who Ruth is, and even went as much as listing an accolade of hers, that she's the court's second female justice.
So, I go with A
Answer:
well
Explanation:
If they are not careful the results can be wrong and they might mess up the evidence. The evidence is so critical to what ever they have to solve. Again tho, The results can also be wrong, and they could mess up something really bad.
Answer:
What you mean by this? um Order in the court?
