1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oxana [17]
3 years ago
6

Opinion-based question: When facing legal action, should teenagers be held to the same standard as adults? Please explain your a

nswer using reasoning, personal knowledge, and current events.
Just answer the question, please. Don't send the homework link 'cuz I can't access it at all. Use the answer from whatever link you got it from so I can get my homework done.​
Law
2 answers:
Mandarinka [93]3 years ago
6 0
No, adults over the age of 19-20 should somewhat know right and wrong. In fact they should know. Teenagers up until the age of 19 are still learning. They are adapting to the adult life. Many of these teenagers are still living under their parents wings and learning for themselves right and wrong. Now if we are talking a capital punishment crime, and if they are over the age of 17 then yes. They should be. Any crime that can amount to a capital crime is something people are taught (hopefully) at a young age that it is wrong. Using logic anyone under the age of 17 is still a child and should be treated as so.
Sholpan [36]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Unless the teenagers do something really bad like so bad that they have to be in prison for 30-35 years then yeah they shouldn't be punished like adults do

Explanation:

You might be interested in
1. What two things characterize human beings in their natural state, according to Locke?
jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

Human freedom and equaility

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Is it legal for the school to look at your private emails?
Allisa [31]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

Unless the account belongs to the school, you can sue them.

3 0
3 years ago
What are two interpretations of the term rule of law, depending on context? (Select all that apply.) Rule of law means that gove
alisha [4.7K]

Answer: your question about the answer to the question is confusing to me

Explanation: I don’t know how to do it

3 0
4 years ago
Is it consider defamation if a guy takes a picture of another girl without her consent ..? ( I saw it happened, Idk what to do)
IceJOKER [234]

Answer: Defamation is "the action of damaging the good reputation of someone; slander or libel". Therefore no

7 0
3 years ago
State three importance of election.​
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

  • An election determines a winner fairly
  • An election is a part of democracy
  • An election will determine the person who runs the country

An election is important to a country's democracy because it determines the winner in a free and fair election.

An election is a part of a working democracy, because if the country did not have an election, it would not be a fair democracy.

An election will <u>fairly</u> determines who will run the country for the next period of years, for example, 4 years or 8 years.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the burden of proof in a criminal case?
    12·1 answer
  • What is true about conflicts of interest?
    11·1 answer
  • The scope of authority and power held by an agency is called____.
    11·1 answer
  • A STATES REPRESENTATION IN THE US SENATE IS BASED ON
    5·1 answer
  • What is a distance determination? How is this done?
    15·2 answers
  • This function of political parties is considered the most important because it is where political parties name their candidates
    10·1 answer
  • Okay so this isn’t for homework, I was just curious.
    15·2 answers
  • What feature helped Portugal become a nation state?
    15·2 answers
  • Which is an example of Quid Pro Quo?
    15·1 answer
  • 2. The national committee of each party has almost unlimited power.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!