Answer:
<em>King </em><em>George</em><em> </em><em>lll </em><em>sent </em><em>British </em><em>soldiers</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>the </em><em>colonies</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>enforce</em><em> </em><em>payment</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>taxes,</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>colonist</em><em> </em><em>sometimes</em><em> </em><em>smuggled </em><em>goods </em><em>into </em><em>colonies</em><em> </em><em>to </em><em>avoid</em><em> </em><em>paying</em><em> taxes</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>The </em><em>items </em><em>were </em><em>marked </em><em>with </em><em>a </em><em>stamp </em><em>to </em><em>show </em><em>the </em><em>tax </em><em>was </em><em>paid.</em>
Answer:
$4,850
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Total cost when the production is 13,000 units
Direct materials $10,920
Direct labor $14,690
Variable overhead $16,380
Total $41,900
And, the other case
Their new cost on supplier offer is
= $2.85 × 13,000 units
= $37,050
In the case when the order is accepted So the net income would increased by
= $41,900 - $37,050
= $4,850
Is this a question or a statement?
I suggest you should get a career rather than a job. It sounds better and should help you focus on that something
Answer:
The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel
Explanation:
First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.
So, referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.
So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.
Answer:
price divisor after split is 4.5
Explanation:
given data
stock prices = $10
stock prices = $20
stock prices = $80
stock prices = $50
stock prices = $40
solution
we find here first price weighted index for all 5 stock that is
price weighted index = 
price weighted index = $40
so
price weighted index before split is $40
so after split last stock became half
so new price divisor
we consider denominator to be x
so
40 = 
x = 
x = 4.5
so price divisor after split is 4.5