Answer:
Yes the absolute privilege for communications made in judicial or other official proceedings apply to statements made when a citizen contracts the police to report suspected criminal activity
Explanation:
Absolute priviledge for communication is the provision that covers a person from legal action on grounds of defamation for statements made. Under certain circumstances a person can make defamatory statements and be immune from legal action.
In this scenario Lydia Harberg went to California Federal Bank to cash a check that was suspected to be fake.
Nolene Showalter contacted SB to confirm. Based on the information provided at that time, the check was confirmed to be fake. The implication was that a fraud was being perpetrated.
So his action of calling the police is justified. SB only verified they gave out wrong information the first time
Answer:
Calculations below
Explanation:
beginning cash balance $ 26,000
Add; Cash receipts $ 105,000
Total cash available $ 131,000
Less: Cash disbursments $ (94,000)
Excess (Deficieny) of cash available over disbursments $ 37,000
Borrowings ($70,000-$37,000) $ 33,000
Ending cash balance $ 70,000
The answer is "incidental beneficiary".
An incidental beneficiary refers to somebody who indirectly acquires an advantage as the aftereffect of the fundamental reason for the trust. An incidental beneficiary is a recipient who isn't a planned recipient. For instance, a grandchild may profit by his/her parent accepting a blessing which could be utilized by the whole family, or which he/she may acquire from the parent.
I think it’s D I’m not sure
