Answer: to be honest, a movie called Padmaavat
Explanation: Although most Bhansali movies are aesthetically pleasing, especially Padmaavat, the way that he writes his characters in this movie are a bit off. Especially in the movie Padmaavat, he writes the character Alauddin Khilji in a more barbaric way, although in real life he was a mild mannered person, and the character Ratan Singh as a calm and collected man. So it seems like as if Bhansali is making Alauddin to be a rogue and barbaric Muslim king and Ratan the righteous and heroic Hindu king. Bhansali also shuts out the fact that Alauddin may have been in a relationship with his slave general Malik Kaufur, and that Alauddin might have even been bi or gay, but in the movie, you see no example of them even being close in a romantic way. So, what I would change is Alauddin’s character, and make him a more proper and calm character and reprsent Alauddin and Malik’s relationship. With the character Padmavati, I feel like that they represented her in a different light. I feel that they didn’t really represent her Sinhalese heritage. Also in the Ghoomar scene, a Rajput queen would probably never dance in front of anyone, they would be watching other dancers. Also the top Deepika wore showed her bosom, which Rajput queens would never show. So, I would try to positively change all the factors I just stated in this paragraph and hope that Sanjay Leela Bhansali will continue to create more beautiful movies.
Personally I do not think so unless they are actually competing for something otherwise it’s for entertainment
Billboard what a tremendous impact
Answer:
My art was bad I was never good at drawing. Now, I have improved a lot in this past year I know how to shade and do all kinds of things.
Explanation:
Answer:
A communist state, also known as a Marxist–Leninist state, is a one-party state that is administered and governed by a communist party guided by Marxism–Leninism. Marxism–Leninism was the state ideology of the Soviet Union, the Comintern after Bolshevisation and the communist states within the Comecon, the Eastern Bloc and the Warsaw Pact.[1] Marxism–Leninism remains the ideology of several communist states around the world and the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.[2]
Communist states are typically administered through democratic centralism by a single centralised communist party apparatus. These parties are usually Marxist–Leninist or some national variation thereof such as Maoism or Titoism, with the official aim of achieving socialism and progressing toward a communist society. There have been several instances of communist states with functioning political participation processes involving several other non-party organisations such as direct democratic participation, factory committees and trade unions, although the communist party remained the centre of power.[3][4][5][6][7]
As a term, communist state is used by Western historians, political scientists and media to refer to these countries. However, these states do not describe themselves as communist nor do they claim to have achieved communism—they refer to themselves as socialist states that are in the process of constructing socialism.[8][9][10][11] Terms used by communist states include national-democratic, people's democratic, socialist-oriented and workers and peasants' states.[12] Academics, political commentators and other scholars tend to distinguish between communist states and democratic socialist states, with the first representing the Eastern Bloc and the latter representing Western Bloc countries which have been democratically governed by socialist parties such as Britain, France, Sweden and Western social-democracies in general, among
