Answer:
The error in the argument is in assuming that the line from p to d passes through line ab - that is, that pd crosses below a. But actually pd passes above a. This means that the angle pad is not equal to x + pab, but rather angle pad = 360-(x+pab). The rest of the "proof" then falls apart.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
$1.27
Step-by-step explanation:
You simply just need to subtract 10.00-8.73 to get your answer which is 1.27.
It’s 13.6
For finding perimeter, you just add all your values together.
1. have you ever borrowed money from a friend?
Answer:
The correct answer is C
Step-by-step explanation:
The height of the original triangle is 3 and the length is 6, so we have a ratio of 3:6. The only triangle that works is the one with a height of 5 and a length of 10 because both simplify to 1:2.
Hope this helped!
