Answer:
meta-analysis
Explanation:
Meta-analysis involves the statistical procedure of combining data and results from multiple studies and trying to determine or draw relevant conclusions from here.
From the example above, Dr. DiLorenzo combines results from a number of studies of same topic to investigate the relationship between two variables. He is doing a meta-analysis.
Answer:
Which answer best explains James Otis' views of the Revolutionary Period? ... Otis felt that representation without taxation was tyranny
Explanation:
<span>sheila's injuries were most likely located in the part of the brain known as the: hindbrain
Hindbrain is the part of brain that regulates the movement of our unconscious muscle (such as the muscles in our heart and lungs)
An injury in this area could disrupt the ability of our lung to contract, making sheila unable to breath on her own</span>
Answer: Char is d. thinking critically
Explanation:
What is critical thinking?
Critical thinking means you evaluate every information objectively in order to make a logical judgement with tangible reasons. This means you evaluate the sources from where the information was found , you scrutinize and examine the facts,observable results and all the findings.
People who can think critically are able to make reasonable judgements and conclusions from any given information and they can differentiate between what is useful information and what is not for them to come to a decision or resolve an issue.
Chat exercises further analysis the information from his friend in order to eliminate any biases and that is critical thinking.
Answer:
C. the good a person can do by being a positive acting force
Explanation:
The philosophy of inaction promoted the idea that a society will reach its harmony if all people just conform normative order within society. It discouraged people to create some sort of action that disrupted that norms. Which is why it's called "philosophy of inaction"
But a problem arise when the social norms itself is very problematic. Under that situation, completely conforming to that norm will keep a certain group of people felt miserable without ever experiencing a change.
For example, Treating peasants like the were lower human being was considered normal. Because it is a norm in most societies to obey the nobles like they were some sort of higher human beings. If people did not act to make a change and all people followed Lao Tzu's philosophy, this situation will probably still exist today.
