1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valentina_108 [34]
3 years ago
9

Help please, due soon.

History
1 answer:
amid [387]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

1. Leading the Nazi Party to become the largest party in the Reichstag.

2. Stripped Jewish Germans of their citizenship and rights.

Explanation:

The Nazi Party took advantage of the people's situation in Germany and therefore made people look at the Nazi party as their only hope to fix Germany.

The Nuremberg laws were not strictly for Jews but were meant to remove rights of Jews and other non-satisfactory people to Nazi's. Nazi's created some really cruel rules within these laws.

You might be interested in
Choose all the responses that describe differences between Sunni and Shia Muslims . A) The majority of the world's Muslims are S
Alex_Xolod [135]
Jdheht yby is didn’t tid rn
7 0
3 years ago
Did 6 million really die in the holocaust
just olya [345]
Yes, 6 million people became victims and die in the Holocaust
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which culture developed the only writing system in the western hemisphere?
ikadub [295]
The answer to this question is: The Mayan Culture
The Mayan developed the Hieroglyphics, which is a writing system that consist of symbols, which is really similar to what the historians have found on the ruins of ancient Egypt.
The Mayans mostly used this symbols to create a visual on their 'interactions with the Gods'.
3 0
4 years ago
Explain how the Scientific revolution relates to the increasing secularization of the nineteenth century.
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

this is long sorry.

Explanation:

The Scientific Revolution was initially a movement that buttressed Christianity. Only in the late 19th century did science become a secularizing force.

It’s often claimed that empirical validation replaced religious authority. That’s a facile assumption but false.

In fact, Boyle and Newton were fervent Christians who believed that modern science provided endless and compelling evidence of God’s Design and existence. Indeed, this was the chief value of science. This attitude prevailed throughout the eighteenth century. Christianity gained a new modern justification in science.

The chief secularizers were not scientists, but Enlightenment philosophers. Their beliefs would become enshrined in the constitutions that would secularize society. The most important of them - Locke, Rousseau and Voltaire - were Christians. Their disgust with religious wars and religious tyranny, and their respect for the dignity of independent thought, drove them to challenge Christian authoritarianism. The Scientific Revolution played little role here.

A few secularists such as d’Holbach and La Mettrie were more clearly driven by scientific views, namely, atomism, but their views had marginal influence on secularism. Moreover, their atheistic materialism has a lineage separate from the Scientific Revolution. It encompasses Spinoza, the School of Padua (philosophers such as Zabarella and Pomponazzi), and the 14th century rediscovery of Lucretius, and it was born from philosophical considerations, not by scientific method. By contrast, whenever materialism intersected the Scientific Revolution, natural philosophers, such as Descartes, Gassendi, and Malebranche endeavored as dutiful Christians to re-infuse that materialism with God.

It wasn’t until the 19th century that science switched sides and became the ally of secularization. Two factors prevailed: Scientific materialism became a dominant viewpoint openly hostile to religion (signaled by Feuerbach in Germany and George Combe in England); and the theory of evolution finally retired science from confirming Design. The intricate workings of Nature no longer attested God’s hand, but were understood as having evolved over geologic time.

But this was a recent development. The modern stand-off between science and religion, and stories like Galileo’s struggle with the Church, lead us to imagine that science was always a secularizing force opposed to Christianity, but the opposite was true.

i hope this will help you with anything :)

7 0
3 years ago
Which political idea would the author of this statement most likely support? "There can be no liberty if the same man or the sam
Snezhnost [94]
The author of this statement would most likely support "Separation of powers", since this system, which is employed in the United States, makes sure that no single branch of government becomes too powerful and therefore tyrannical. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was George Washington's experience different in the French and Indian War and the American Revolutionary War? A. He was capt
    7·1 answer
  • Match each physical property on the left with its description on the right.
    12·2 answers
  • Why was the battle of antietam considered a turning point in the war?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements does NOT describe the ancient river valley civilization of Sumer?
    10·2 answers
  • How did Rome control the privileges and benefits of citizenship
    7·2 answers
  • How did the British government attempt to eliminate conflict between Native Americans and colonists?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the war come to an “end”? Ww1
    11·1 answer
  • How does the idea of individualism continue to make united states unique?
    15·2 answers
  • Which U.S. Supreme Court case focused on the right to protection from unlawful searches?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a typical tactic of nativists in the early 1900s? registering immigrants to vote campaigning for pro-
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!