Answer: The Iliad is about strength and the Odyssey is about cunning
Explanation:
A difference that becomes apparent in the very first lines of the epics. Whereas the Iliad tells the story of the rage of Achilles, the strongest hero in the Greek army, the Odyssey focuses on a “man of twists and turns".
Hello Samantha! I have another example about practicing soccer. Since I play on my high school team, our coach told us at the beginning of the year which was around 8 months ago, at the end of the season I want to see you do 30 juggles. Now, juggling for me is extremely hard but I wanted to succeed in this challenge he gave our team. The last 8 months I have been juggling almost every other day and every few weeks i was making 3-4 more juggles than I was the few weeks before. Now, I can not only do 30 but 50 juggles all because In practiced and motivation from my coach.,
The third one fits the best.
The passage that best summarizes the ideas from both texts is:
D. The United States wanted to move westward to fulfill their Manifest Destiny, experience religious freedoms, and obtain more land and natural resources.
Americans believed that it was their divine responsibility to spread liberty to The West. Some people moved westward to freely practice their religious beliefs.
One of the largest attractions of The West was the vast amount of land. There were also numerous natural resources, including gold. Land, natural resources, religious freedom, and Manifest Destiny were all reasons why the United States looked westward.
<h3>What is a Summary?</h3>
This refers to the concise representation of the main ideas of a text in an objective manner.
Thus, the summary of the different passages is given above and option B is the correct answer.
Read more about The Manifest Destiny here:
brainly.com/question/23373577
#SPJ1
Answer:
Swarbrick is young compared with other parliamentarians, and she feels that the older generation cannot understand the threat of global warming.
Explanation:
The given passage is from the text titled <em>"OK, boomer,
" retorts lawmaker to heckler during climate change meeting
</em>.
It tells about Chlöe Swarbrick's speech in the New Zealand Parliament. Bringing the attention of the rest of the parliament to an important issue, climate change, she mentions her age, emphasizing that it will be the younger generations who will be dealing with the consequences of global warming, not most of the members of the parliament, who will no longer be its members in a couple of decades. They do not understand the threat of global warming, which is why they are not paying attention to it, despite the fact they should.
This is why the third option is the correct one.
