Answer: Walking Green is an example of a CITIZEN-ACTION PUBLIC.
A citizen action public can be defined as a situation or a scenario whereby the decision of a company is being challenged by the the public which can be the consumers or any group that contribute significantly to the marketing success of the company.
The act of Walking Green challenging Kelstone Developers is an act of citizen action public.
Answer:
When someone who didn't study for the exam blame his inability to pass the exam on his luck.
Explanation:
Attribution error occurs when people diver the cause of a situation that supposed to be internal into something external.
In the example above, the reason why that student fail the exam is because he come to the exam room unprepared. But rather than acknowledging his mistake, he rather blame all of it on luck (which is outside of his control) in order to protect his own ego. In such situation, that student has comitted an attribution error.
Russian Roulette is a game where 2 or more people sit at a table and they spin a revolver with only one bullet in the chamber who ever the barrel of the gun points at takes the gun, spins the chamber, points it at there head and pulls the trigger if the don't die they then don't get shot they repeat this process till someone gets shot who ever lives wins obviously
During the majority of WWI, the United States wanted to remain isolated in what many considered to be a European conflict. President Woodrow Wilson himself advocated isolationism until a series of conflicts drew the US into war against Germany.
Answer:
a) Malthus ignored other factors like technological change.
Explanation:
Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) was an English cleric and a scholar, most known for his demographics theory. He is an author of <em>An Essay on the Principle of Population</em>, where he observed that increasing production of food resulted in improved well-being of the population, but this was temporary because it led to a population growth. Larger population led to the restoration of original production per capita.
He was mainly wrong because he did not account for improvement in technology of production. Development and widespread use of technology meant that it is not needed to use the same amount of energy to produce goods. Production increased much faster than the increase of population, which resulted in a failure of his theory.
