1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ale4655 [162]
2 years ago
5

Explanation on what happened to the lost colonist, support opinion, facts, details and evidence for the case files

History
1 answer:
Lisa [10]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:The origins of one of the America’s oldest unsolved mysteries can be traced to August 1587, when a group of about 115 English settlers arrived on Roanoke Island, off the coast of what is now North Carolina. Later that year, it was decided that John White, governor of the new colony, would sail back to England in order to gather a fresh load of supplies. But just as he arrived, a major naval war broke out between England and Spain, and Queen Elizabeth I called on every available ship to confront the mighty Spanish Armada. In August 1590, White finally returned to Roanoke, where he had left his wife and daughter, his infant granddaughter (Virginia Dare, the first English child born in the Americas) and the other settlers three long years before. He found no trace of the colony or its inhabitants, and few clues to what might have happened, apart from a single word—“Croatoan”—carved into a wooden post.

Investigations into the fate of the “Lost Colony” of Roanoke have continued over the centuries, but no one has come up with a satisfactory answer. “Croatoan” was the name of an island south of Roanoke that was home to a Native American tribe of the same name. Perhaps, then, the colonists were killed or abducted by Native Americans. Other hypotheses hold that they tried to sail back to England on their own and got lost at sea, that they met a bloody end at the hands of Spaniards who had marched up from Florida or that they moved further inland and were absorbed into a friendly tribe. In 2007, efforts began to collect and analyze DNA from local families to figure out if they’re related to the Roanoke settlers, local Native American tribes or both. Despite the lingering mystery, it seems there’s one thing to be thankful for: The lessons learned at Roanoke may have helped the next group of English settlers, who would found their own colony 17 years later just a short distance to the north, at Jamestown.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why don't members of congress from both parties "argue" with the reports and reviews submitted to them by the cbo?
ValentinkaMS [17]

Members of Congress from both parties do not argue with the reports and reviews of the CBO because its nonpartisan and thus does not lean on either side of the political divide. Its reports and reviews are unbiased and objective aimed at ensuring prudent use of public resources

6 0
3 years ago
Why might the author have chosen to use headings that start with “Myth:” throughout the entire article?
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

To help put the content of the article into groups based on the myth they address

Explanation:

If this is one of the choices then it is correct, if not please let me know. Enjoy

5 0
2 years ago
Southern Democrat’s wanted-but-so
Novosadov [1.4K]

All you're basically doing is filling out/answering the following questions: who is the person? What did they want? What hindered their plan or what challenges did they face? What happened after that?

Hope this helps. Have a good day! :)

3 0
3 years ago
EDGE
hram777 [196]

Answer:

a) The response earned 1 point because it identifies capitalism as the economic change in the period

1750–1900 that led to the formation of new elites.

b) The response earned 1 point because it explains how traditional elites such as aristocrats remained in power

in the period 1750–1900 by helping the monarch rule and make laws.

c) The response did not earn the point because it does not address or explain an ideology that emerged from

the formation of new elites in the period 1750–1900.

7 0
2 years ago
Why should we not judge events and people of the past by our own standards?
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

Why shouldn't we judge historical figures by the standards of our time?

Many of the vices we might rightfully judge a historical society or individual for are largely universal across culture and society.

We should judge them accordingly and learn from their mistakes, but we should also judge them by the degree to which that person or culture rejected those common vices and built something better. This is something quite rare and it’s far more useful as a learning tool for us to focus on this.

For example, the Greeks and Romans practiced slaveryBut so did every other ancient society. What is unique and admirable about the Greeks and Romans is the degree to which they did respect indvidual rights, seriously questioned slavery as an institution, and developed a secular, pro reason culture

if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some expectations that the government has for citizens ?
    14·1 answer
  • Exactly how many times did FDR visit Georgia?
    13·2 answers
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    7·2 answers
  • A design dictated by function may be protected by a(n
    10·1 answer
  • Which best describes how the status of the Civil War affected Lincoln’s reelection in 1864? The Civil War was close to ending. T
    5·2 answers
  • Women played a major role on the domestic front during ww2 by what?
    12·1 answer
  • U
    5·2 answers
  • Which ideas are included in both documents? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • Who approves a treaty once it has been negotiated? a President (Executive Branch) b Senate (Legislative Branch) c Supreme Court
    10·1 answer
  • Which actions are examples of plagiarism? Select three options.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!