It may includes: Evaluation, <span>Research Development, and Testing
Evaluation is carried out to know whether the knowledge would be beneficial to society. Research development is carried out to know the strategic approach needed to exctract that knowledge, and testing is carried out in order to know whether the conclusion could be applicable according to what the researchers have predicted.</span>
Powhatan is the right answer i believe
the right answer is: that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid the consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents.
Because according to studies on the peer influence of adolescents and decision making says that moving past research center investigations of age contrasts in "cool" psychological procedures identified with hazard discernment and thinking, new methodologies have moved concentration to the impact of social and enthusiastic factors on immature neurocognition. When teenagers invest an expanding measure of energy with their companions, explore recommends that peer-related boosts may sharpen the reward framework to react to the reward estimation of dangerous conduct. As the intellectual control framework step by step develops through the span of the high school years, teenagers develop in their ability to facilitate influence and insight, and to practice self-direction even insincerely stimulating circumstances. These limits are reflected in progressive development in the ability to oppose peer impact.
I would agree that the main reason was that we wanted to protect a country from communism. I often wonder though if the Vietnam conflict was not more of a conflict between USSR and the United States than it was a conflict between North and South Vietnam.
-IrWilliams
Answer:
Pearl Harbor (atomic bomb in Hawaii (i think it was atomic))
Explanation:
I learned about this :)