I once went to a football game, and my team lost. so, the next time i go to one of their games they will lose again." This is an example of a weak inductive argument. Inductive reasoning allows for the possibility that the conclusion is false and inductive argument is an<span> argument that is intended to be strong rather than valid. </span> It is a failed<span> inductive argument, because it is intended to be strong but is in fact weak.</span>
One argument against the claim that Julius Caesar destroyed the Roman Republic is that he changed the constitution.
Julius Caesar was a very powerful dictator in ancient Rome. He got into the realm of power through his alliance with Pompey and Crassus.
As a Roman ruler he made several reforms to the Roman Constitution. He passed tax laws that benefitted the poor people. They were able to have ownership of lands and also means of survival.
The correct answer would be "To support their opinions".
In any kind of group discussion there will most likely be a variety of opinions. The flow will be dictated by the ability of each participant in expressing serious interpretations in a respectful manner. The role of fact presentation or data gathering isn't to prove that you can do research but to make your point stronger with empirical facts, statistics or studies that bring an element of <u>objectivity.</u>
