The correct fill the blanks from the drop-down menu are:
A) infuriated.
D)proprietary.
<h3>What do you mean by infuriated?</h3>
Infuriated means making someone impatient or angry.
<h3>What does proprietary mean?</h3>
Proprietary means to have ownership of something or someone.
Thus, the correct options are A) infuriated.
D)proprietary.
Learn more about infuriated
brainly.com/question/1686266
The factual details te author includes are:
-It fell to earth at approximately 3:15 p.m. on June 12, 2014.
-NASA scientis concluded that the spherical metal object was likely part of a spacecraft that survived reentry.
Money can buy you alot of things
But the things money can’t buy
•Friends
•Dreams
•Health
•wisdom
•Respect
•Time
Answer:
Diction refers to the linguistic choices a writer makes to effectively convey an idea, a point of view, or tell a story. In literature, the words used by an author can help establish a distinct voice and style.Diction is the language a writer chooses to express an idea. The choice of words in a literary work is said to be diction. A work's diction develops one of its centrally significant literary elements. writers use the words to convey action, exhibit character, mention attitudes, recognize themes and intimate values.
In Greek mythology, Midas is a king obsessed with wealth. He asks the gods for the ability to turn anything he touches to gold. The gods grant his wish, and Midas soon realizes this gift is actually a curse. Chesterton uses the story of Midas as an analogy for chasing materialistic success. Much as the authors worship material wealth and pursue it as if it were attainable, Midas learns that his new ability doesn’t help him succeed because it prevents him from performing necessary tasks such as eating. Chesterton reminds readers of the obvious moral of Midas's story and shows that authors who write about success often misinterpret Midas's story—sometimes by using phrases such as "the Midas touch" in a positive light.
Chesterton emphasizes that King Midas is an example of foolishness and failure. He implies that, for the same reason, writers who encourage people to chase material success share Midas's foolishness:
We all know of such men. We are ever meeting or reading about such persons who turn everything they touch into gold. Success dogs their very footsteps. Their life's pathway leads unerringly upwards. They cannot fail.
Unfortunately, however, Midas could fail; he did. His path did not lead unerringly upward. He starved because whenever he touched a biscuit or a ham sandwich it turned to gold. That was the whole point of the story . . .
