Answer:
Hope the above picture might help you dude :)
Answer: The Equator
The Equator, or line of 0 degrees latitude, divides the Earth into the Northern and Southern hemispheres. The Northern Hemisphere contains North America, the northern part of South America, Europe, the northern two-thirds of Africa, and most of Asia.
Explanation:
Answer: Yes it is.
Explanation: Interpersonal communication is a process where people exchange information, feelings, and emotions through verbal and non-verbal messages, Twitter is a network that meets these characteristics. On Twitter, people can engage in a conversation in real-time and not at the same time. They can send messages to each other and reply when they can.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "b. anger directed by attribution of fault." The final stage in the process of radicalization by globalization, which usually requires the emergence of a leader, is known as anger directed by attribution of fault.
Here are the following choices:
<span>a. anger in reaction
</span><span>b. anger directed by attribution of fault
</span><span>c. anger in comparison
</span>d. anger in context
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
