Chinese River Valley civilization<span>although it was from 8000 to 2000 BCE
They used the river for irrigation and they raised pigs and chickens. Used stone tools</span>
Checks and balances? that might not be right i’m not sure
Answer:
Bradstreet hated the Native Indian and Johnson believed in a friendly relation with them.
Explanation:
Sir William Johnson was an Irish military officer of the British army. He had a good relationship with the Native Americans in America after he arrived in the province of New York in 1738. Johnson becomes involved in trading with Indians especially with the Mohawk (the Six Nations of the Iroquois League). Johnson was given name Warraghiyagey and called him as sachem. After the French and Indian War, he was appointed as British ambassador to the Iroquois and became head of Indian Affairs for the northern colonies in America.
John Bradstreet hated the Native Indians as he calls them savages and brutes. Bradstreet did not want any relationship with the American Indians.
a - 7 < <span>
a - 9 Give the fractions a common denominator. (2 and 3 both go into 6)
</span>
a - 7 <
a - 9 Subtract <span>
a from both sides
-7 < </span><span>
a - 9 Add 9 to both sides
</span>2 < <span>
a Multiply both sides by 6 to cancel out the fraction
12 < a Flip the inequality to make it easier to read
a > 12</span>
Hello. You forgot to put the text to which this question refers. The text is:
The great idea in Article V is that change requires two elements: consensus and necessity. There must be substantive national agreement, as well as agreement in most of the states, that an urgent problem exists that cannot be remedied by the courts, legislatures or Congress, and which can be solved only if the Constitution is changed.
—Mary Frances Berry, The New York Times, September 13, 1987
Answer:
Amending the Constitution
Explanation:
The above text reflects on how the constitution changes through amendments should be. the author of the text shows that the amendments should only be approved when there is a mutual agreement between several factors that prove and justify that there is a problem in society that is impossible to be solved by courts, legislatures or Congress. Furthermore, this problem needs to be solved with such urgency that only an amendment to the constitution, that is, a modification of the constitution can solve it. If this condition were not proposed, the constitution would run the risk of being a set of temporary laws with little or no real influence.
