Sports personalities are portrayed as public properties, by the media. Their every move, personal life etc., are disclosed by the media. Their life becomes public, and one single negative news about them brings about backlash from the public.
Media should not infringe the personal space of the sportsperson.
Media should not exaggerate the loss of the sportsperson, in any game.
Media should support the sportsperson, and not create their negative image.
Media should help the sportsperson, who have lesser funds, in obtaining sponsorships.
Yes, As much as people try to fix it there is still racism
Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
Answer: asking the individual's friends about his smoking behavior
hope this helped
Answer:
they are the right to vote, the right to carry a firearm, and the right to vote.
