1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mice21 [21]
3 years ago
9

2b. Explain the point of view of the Prime Minister concerning education for black South Africans.

History
2 answers:
Makovka662 [10]3 years ago
7 0
I just need points so sorry
koban [17]3 years ago
3 0

Verwoerd was an authoritarian, socially conservative leader and an Afrikaner nationalist. He was a member of the Afrikaner Broederbond, an exclusively white and Christian Calvinist secret organization dedicated to advancing the Afrikaner "volk" interests, and like many members of the organization had verbally supported Germany during World War II. Broederbond members like Verwoerd would assume high positions in government upon the Nationalist electoral victory in 1948 and come to wield a profound influence on public and civil society throughout the apartheid era in South Africa.

Verwoerd's desire to ensure white, and especially Afrikaner dominance in South Africa, to the exclusion of the country's nonwhite majority, was a major aspect of his support for a republic (though removing the British monarchy was long a nationalist aspiration anyway). To that same end, Verwoerd greatly expanded apartheid.[citation needed] He branded the system as a policy of "good-neighborliness", stating that different races and cultures could only reach their full potential if they lived and developed apart from each other, avoiding potential cultural clashes,[neutrality is disputed] and that the white minority had to be protected from the majority non-white in South Africa by pursuing a "policy of separate development" namely apartheid and keeping power firmly in the hands of whites.[citation needed] Given Verwoerd's background as a social science academic, he attempted to justify apartheid on ethical and philosophical grounds. This system however saw the complete disfranchisement of the nonwhite population.[2]

Verwoerd heavily repressed opposition to apartheid during his premiership. He ordered the detention and imprisonment of tens of thousands of people and the exile of further thousands, while at the same time greatly empowering, modernizing, and enlarging the white apartheid state's security forces (police and military). He banned black organizations such as the African National Congress and the Pan Africanist Congress, and it was under him that future president Nelson Mandela was imprisoned for life for sabotage.[3][4] Verwoerd's South Africa had one of the highest prison populations in the world and saw a large number of executions and floggings. By the mid-1960s Verwoerd's government to a large degree had put down internal civil resistance to apartheid by employing extraordinary legislative power, draconian laws, psychological intimidation, and the relentless efforts of the white state's security forces.

Apartheid as a program began in 1948 with D. F. Malan's premiership, but it was Verwoerd's large role in its formulation and his efforts to place it on a firmer legal and theoretical footing, including his opposition to even the limited form of integration known as baasskap, that have led him to be dubbed the "Architect of Apartheid". His actions prompted the passing of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1761, condemning apartheid, and ultimately leading to South Africa's international isolation and economic sanctions. On 6 September 1966, Verwoerd was stabbed several times by parliamentary aide Dimitri Tsafendas. He died shortly after, and Tsafendas was jailed until his death in 1999.

You might be interested in
Who was the first Communist leader of China after WWII?
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

Deng Xiaoping

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following cases would the Supreme Court most likely hear
Furkat [3]

Answer:

The case that the Supreme Court is most likely to hear is a federal case involving national security and the Constitutional powers of the president during times of emergency.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What made man start giving death penalties?
avanturin [10]
Well everything is inspired by something so back in old times, embarrassing people(not like public, it means like force them to have intercourse with u), bloodshed, or cheating on your spouse will result in the death penalty because it was so serious and they didn't have those iron stone prison buildings we have today so maybe death was easier than serving time, but death penalties were given because of religion, crazy religion like devil worshippers, baal, and etc, people were cutting themselves to death/sacrificing children or themselves to death as well. Today we don't do death penalties, we just serve time, terrroists do death penalties but that is not right, what made man start, that's unknown but it did happen and it became popular in states.
4 0
2 years ago
who wrote the gettysburg address A.) Robert E lee B) James Madison C) Abraham Lincoln or D) Jefferson Davis please help
Tasya [4]
C.) Abraham Lincoln wrote the Gettysburg Address on November 19th, 1863, in Gettysburg Pennsylvania.
7 0
3 years ago
Which branch of the ancient greek was responsible for writing laws and dictating foreign policy
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

the answer is Ekklesia

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What language was one of the most important gifts from rome?
    12·1 answer
  • What is a tenement?
    6·2 answers
  • The majority of the slave trade routes begin in...
    8·2 answers
  • How did John Quincy Adams treat Native Americans? A. He made peace with many Native American nations. B. He formed many reservat
    9·1 answer
  • Who worked with robert morris to finance the american revolution
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the focus on abortion opponents today?
    14·2 answers
  • As the coach of the U.S. Olympic cycling team, I can state
    14·1 answer
  • Why did France occupy the Ruhr region​
    9·1 answer
  • In the Dred Scott decision, why did the Supreme Court say that slave owners could legally take their slaves into any territory o
    13·2 answers
  • Which country was hurt the most with the Embargo Act of 1807?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!