I feel like it could be either A or B but im not sure due to the fact that I have no idea what the passage was about and which president we are discussing
An evaluative thesis from the following options is "Keeping a regular schedule is so much better than letting each day's schedule be different and random".
A claim that expresses an opinion about the subject, on the other hand, is one that elicits criticism is an evaluative thesis. It renders a decision. It declares that one subject is superior to or inferior to another. The opinion expressed in option B, which illustrates an evaluative thesis, is that adhering to a schedule is preferable to following a random timetable.
The language used in the abovementioned statement is provoking which is a feature of an evaluative thesis.
Thus, the correct option is B.
To learn more about evaluative thesis here
brainly.com/question/28014427
#SPJ1
Answer:
Events are decided in advance by powers beyond one's control.
Explanation:
A fatalist is one who believes in fate (happening of events outside a person's control, predetermined by supernatural forces). This definition is also evident from the sentence which he himself says in explanation of fatalist i.e "What will be, will be", meaning what is bound to happen, will happen.
Option A is incorrect because fatalist is derived from fate, not fatal (deadly)
Options B and D are incorrect because they are opposite of what "fate/fatalist" mean.
A global citizen is someone who self-identifies first and foremost not as a member of a state, a tribe or a nation, but as a member of the human race, and someone who is prepared to act on that belief, to tackle our world's greatest challenges.
