This is a very philosophical question, so it requires your own opinions and reasoning. I will help as much as I can for you to develop your thoughts, but I cannot write them for you.
One of the most important things for you to reference in question two is the natural state of man. How was it like? Are we peaceful and individualistic, as John Locke states in <em>Two Treatise of Government</em>, or are humans selfish and natural life would be "nasty, brutish, and short" as Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes state in <em>The Prince </em>and <em>The Leviathan </em>(respective titles)? Why is this so?
These philosophers also give a reason as to why government is necessary for humankind. For Locke, it is to protect the people from larger threats. For Hobbes, it is to make man civilized. For Machiavelli, it is for a leader to align their self-interest with those of the people and make a prosperous community.
If you need any more help, ask me! I hope this helps :)
Answer:
Nepal is compared with the garden, which is a place where different types of flowers are grown. The fragrance of these flowers enchants the whole garden making it beautiful and pleasant. Similarly, the diversity of Nepalese people makes it a beautiful country where each community has something unique to go back to the nation. This essence of Nepal makes its people feel proud and happy. Nepal is a typical home of many castes, cultures, and civilizations because such diversity among various tribes makes Nepal beautiful. Nepal has a substantial physical variation; land form range from low-lying flat plains of the south as Kechana Kalan in Jhapa to the highest mountains of the world in the north. Floras and faunas, diverse wildlife, and mesmerizing landscapes have added beauty to the nature of Nepal.
The answer is true if correct!!!
Answer:
The progressive constitution granted universal suffrage, stripped Emperor Hirohito of all but symbolic power, stipulated a bill of rights, abolished peerage, and outlawed Japan's right to make war.
Explanation:
This is only true per square mile or square kilometer, but it's false generally (so I would say that the statement is false).
For example, Hong Kong and Macau have by far higher population density (with Macau said to have the biggest population density in the world) than mainland China, but Mainland China has a larger population.
