Answer:
Immigration in the 1920s is different than it is today because in the 1920s less people immigrated to different locations because they did not have knowledge on where to go or why they even would go. Another reason it would have changed since the 1920's is because the world population has not been the same after the 20s and now there are more people immigrating into different parts of the world.
Explanation:
A disease-ridden, bug-infested swamp with bad water: what a place to found a colony! But there were advantages as well to what was chosen as the site of the first permanent English settlement in North America.
To learn more about each reason contributing to the selection of Jamestown in 1607, click on the title next to each of the six images below.
Answer:
They were enemies.
Explanation:
Americans strongly opposed Japan's invasion of China in 1937. President Roosevelt imposed increasingly stringent economic sanctions intended to deprive Japan of the oil and steel, as well as dollars, it needed to continue its war in China. Japan reacted by forging an alliance with Germany and Italy in 1940, known as the Tripartite Pact, which worsened its relations with the US. In July 1941, the United States, Great Britain, and the Netherlands froze all Japanese assets and cut off oil shipments—Japan had little oil of its own.
Tobacco and Sugar played similar roles in the Virginia and Caribbean economies by helping the economies of the colonists,
In these areas, Indentured slaves were used to provide slave labor that they used to cultivate sugarcane in the Colonies.
Both Sugar and Tobacco were exported and sold in the colonies for profit. Very high levels of profit was gotten from the sale of both products. The profits they got was used to take care of the economy, pay taxes and it was also used to buy goods from England.
Read more on brainly.com/question/746916?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
It legitimized the establishment of a segregated society in the Southern states.
Explanation:
In the Plessy v. Ferguson Case (1896), the Supreme Court ruled that racially segregated public facilities (common in the Southern States) were legal because they did not imply any discrimination against African Americans as long as they were consistent to the doctrine of "separate but equal" which provided segregated but equal facilities (in terms of quality) to both white and non-white people. As a result, this case legitimized the establishment of a segregated society in the Southern states and allowed for discrimination to continue because, in reality, segregated facilities were rarely equal.
