Answer:
Explanation:
O people ...................... 1-Nohay, nonsense .... People have destroyed the aspirations: words without action, knowledge without patience, and faith without certainty. Men and I see no minds! And I hear a sensuous person, but I do not see a human being! The people entered, by God, then they left, knew then denied, forbidden and then permissible, but the debt of one of you is a lick on his tongue, if asked, do you believe in the Day of Judgment? He said: Yes! A lie and the owner of the Day of Judgment 2- One of the ethics of the believer is strength in religion, faith in certainty, knowledge in a dream, a dream with knowledge, a bag of compassion, endurance in need, intention in wealth, giving in rights, and fairness in integrity, which does not deny those who hate And he does not sin in helping the one he loves, he does not whisper, wink, or nudge, he does not slander, he does not play, he does not play, and he does not smell bereavement if it is caused by someone else, and he is not pleased with the sin if it is caused by something else.
Answer:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/switch-between-languages-using-the-language-bar-1c2242c0-fe15-4bc3-99bc-535de6f4f258
Explanation:
это может помочь
Uphejdjfjdkjdnfjdjjrjrjrjjrjdjdj sorry rhhrktiitiirifififiitirjtutiututitifgifjfjjggjgigufijjj
Answer: The fights between gladiators in ancient Rome were brutal. It was not like a football game (American or otherwise) where it would be assumed that both sides would go home with just a couple of bruises. Death was a fairly common occurrence at a gladiatorial game, but that doesn't mean it was inevitable. One gladiator might be lying prone in the blood-absorbing sand of the arena, with the other gladiator holding a sword (or whichever weapon he was assigned) at his throat. Instead of simply plunging in the weapon and consigning his opponent to death, the winning gladiator would look for a signal to tell him what to do. The winning gladiator would get his signal—not from the crowd as illustrated in the famous 19th century painting by Jean-Léon Gérôme (1824–1904)—but rather from the referee of the game, the editor (or editor muneris), who might also be a senator, emperor or another politico. He was the one to make the final decisions about the fates of the gladiators in the arena. However, since the games were meant to curry public favor, the editor had to pay attention to the wishes of the audience. Much of the audience attended such brutal events for the single purpose of witnessing the bravery of a gladiator in the face of death.By the way, gladiators never said "Morituri te salutant" ("Those who are about to die salute you"). That was said once to Emperor Claudius (10 BC–54 CE) on the occasion of a staged naval battle, not gladiatorial combat.
<h2>
<em><u>Ways to End a Fight Between Gladiators</u></em></h2>
Gladiatorial contests were dangerous and potentially fatal, but not as often fatal as Hollywood would have us believe: Gladiators were rented from their training school (ludus) and a good gladiator was expensive to replace, so most battles did not end in death. There were only two ways that a gladiatorial battle could be ended—either one gladiator won or it was a draw—but it was the editor who had the final say on whether the loser died on the field or went on to fight another day.
The editor had three established ways to make his decision.
He might have established rules (lex) in advance of the game. If the fight's sponsors wanted a fight to the death, they had to be willing to compensate the lanista (trainer) who had rented out the dead gladiator.
He could accept the surrender of one of the gladiators. After having lost or cast aside his weapons, the losing gladiator would fall to his knees and raise his index finger (ad digitatum).
He could listen to the audience. When a gladiator went down, cries of Habet, Hoc habet! (He's had it!), and shouts of Mitte! (Let him go!) or Lugula! (Kill him!) could be heard.
A game that ended in death was known as a sine remissione (without dismissal).
Thumbs
Answer:
The percent of the tennis players NOT from the United States is:
88%.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:"
Number of top 100 women's tennis players in the world = 100
The number of this from the United States = 12
This represents 12% (12/100) of the population of top tennis players in the world.
Therefore, the number of top tennis players in the world that is not from the United States = 88 (100 - 12)
This number represents 88% (88/100) of the population of top tennis players in the world.
b) The question requires the expression of the numbers into two groups: those from the United States (12) and the remaining 88 (100 - 12) NOT from the United States. Once this is done, the resulting figures are expressed as percentages of the total, and the rest is the required answer.
