Answer:
The South valued slaves more because they used them as workers in farming and agriculture.The South had a lot of fertile land which they used to their advantage in the cotton and tobacco industry. The north was more abolitionist and supportive of getting rid of slavery while the stubborn South wanted to keep their ways of life in place. They (the North) focused on becoming more modern and industrialized and more city-like. The North expanded their economy and built more factories and job opportunities, while the South focused on farming.
Explanation:
That would be my answer.
Had no effect on the war I think because it was fought after the treaty was already signed.
Hello,
Slavery made some colonies more likely to exploit large numbers of enslaved africans
Over time the impact of the foreign policy could have been: The coverage applied to a world divided through the cold conflict, a conflict between the USA and the Soviet Union.
A kingdom's foreign policy or outside policy (as opposed to inner or home policy) is its goals and activities with regard to its interactions with other states, unions, and other political entities, whether bilaterally or via multilateral systems.[2] The Encyclopedia Britannica notes that a central authority's overseas policy may be stimulated via "home considerations, the policies or behavior of other states, or plans to improve precise geopolitical designs.
Foreign policy, standard targets that manual the activities and relationships of one state in its interactions with different states. The improvement of overseas policy is influenced by the aid of home considerations, the rules or behavior of different states, or plans to strengthen precise geopolitical designs.
Learn more about foreign policy here: brainly.com/question/2196996
#SPJ9
