Answer:
if a police car is following you with its siren swearing or emergency lights flashing pull over to the right quickly but safely and come to a complete stop in a safe place.
Explanation:
this is a true fact about life when you're driving
To ensure that the driver understands that the offense that they have broke, meanwhile the officer is trying to maintain a safe situation.
So keep everyone safe, inform the offender, take action via. Verbal Warning, Written Warning, Ticket, or Arrest.
Answer:
The three state institutions that deal with human rights violations are - CESCR or Economic, Social and Culture Rights, Humans Rights Committee (CCPR), Committee on the 'Elimination of Discrimination against Women' (CEDAW) and CAT or Committee against torture
Answer:
TO ENSURE THAT ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS OPERATE WITHIN THE LAW.
TO GUARANTEE THE SAFETY OF INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS.
TO PROMOTE UNITY IN EXECUTION OF WORK.
Explanation: laws are meant to be obeyed and enforced, organizations and individuals operating in a given Country, State or County are expected to work within the ambit of the law. When the security policies, procedures, controls are aligned with regulations it helps to guarantee easy understanding and facilitates its compliance.
The safety Management program also involves the Law of the land,the alignment of policies, procedures, controls and regulations will help organisations and individuals to work or operate safely by practising the Law. It will help to prevent ACCIDENTS,SECURITY BREACH,and other possibilities which can lead to THEFT,FRAUD,LOSS OF LIFE etc.
Aligning policies, procedures, controls and regulations will ensure that every organization and individuals execute their jobs following the same set standards according to the laws guiding it, through this systems can be predictable and compliance can be achieved easily.
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.
Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;
-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and
-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.
The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.
On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or
-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.
To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults
#SPJ4
