C. focused on state rights versus national rights.
This is because Federalism is an idea of two parts of government, with the national government superseding the state government. Since in the Brown case the state fought it had the right to refuse, even though the national government passed a law stating schools must be desegregated, the brown case and federalism are related.
Answer:
The democratic decline is caused by the state-led weakening of political institutions that sustain the democratic system, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections. ... The latter forms of backsliding entail the debilitation of democratic institutions from within.
Hamilton's great aim was more efficient organization, whereas Jefferson once said "I am not a friend to a very energetic government." Hamilton feared anarchy and thought in terms of the order; Jefferson feared tyranny and thought in terms of freedom. The United States needed both influences.
Federalism Hamilton and Jefferson also disagreed about the power of the federal government. Hamilton wanted the federal government to have greater power than state governments. A strong federal government, he argued, was needed to increase commerce.
Jefferson's most fundamental political belief was an "absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority." Stemming from his deep optimism in human reason, Jefferson believed that the will of the people, expressed through elections, provided the most appropriate guidance for directing the republic's course. Everything is weak about democracy. :
Please brainlist. This should help you on your disccusion.
I can suggest some sentences:
1) you can describe what it was:
Manifest Destiny was the belief that settling in America was a destiny, or right, of the settlers.
2) you can describe its effect:
Manifest Destiny was a belief that justified many injustices towards the indigenous people because it suggested that the settlers had a right for the land, which in turn undermined the indigenous claim to the land.
Answer:
should include nonhuman animal pleasures and pains in the overall utilitarian calculus
Explanation:
Utilitarianism can be described as an ethical theory that tells the actions that can help in the maximization of happiness for the people that are involved. It talks about the actions that encourages happiness or pleasure while discouraging those that cause unhappiness.
According to shaw and Barry, utilitarianism should go as far as including nonhuman animal pleasures and pains in the overall utilitarian calculus.
Thank you!
