Answer:
<em>It implies that the economic status of the country is not positive. That means that the economy is operating below its capacity and not efficient.</em>
Explanation:
<u>Economic efficiency</u> is a situation where the resources of the economy are used in the service of the individuals of the country while utilizing it efficiently to get optimum results. When individuals are looking for jobs and they do not get employed, it simply means that the economy is not doing great. When the resources of the economy are not utilized well there is stunted economic growth in the country.
Therefore the high unemployment rate in a country means that the economic status is not positive.
Answer:C is the correct answer hope this helps
Explanation: Mark as brainlyest
India is suddenly in the news for all the wrong reasons. It is now hitting the headlines as one of the most unequal countries in the world, whether one measures inequality on the basis of income or wealth.
So how unequal is India? As the economist Branko Milanovic says: “The question is simple, the answer is not.” Based on the new India Human Development Survey (IHDS), which provides data on income inequality for the first time, India scores a level of income equality lower than Russia, the United States, China and Brazil, and more egalitarian than only South Africa.
According to a report by the Johannesburg-based company New World Wealth, India is the second-most unequal country globally, with millionaires controlling 54% of its wealth. With a total individual wealth of $5,600 billion, it’s among the 10 richest countries in the world – and yet the average Indian is relatively poor.
Compare this with Japan, the most equal country in the world, where according to the report millionaires control only 22% of total wealth.
In India, the richest 1% own 53% of the country’s wealth, according to the latest data from Credit Suisse. The richest 5% own 68.6%, while the top 10% have 76.3%. At the other end of the pyramid, the poorer half jostles for a mere 4.1% of national wealth.
What’s more, things are getting better for the rich. The Credit Suisse data shows that India’s richest 1% owned just 36.8% of the country’s wealth in 2000, while the share of the top 10% was 65.9%. Since then they have steadily increased their share of the pie. The share of the top 1% now exceeds 50%.
This is far ahead of the United States, where the richest 1% own 37.3% of total wealth. But India’s finest still have a long way to go before they match Russia, where the top 1% own a stupendous 70.3% of the country’s wealth.
The foreshortening of the nose with telescoping is a finding of <u>Naso-orbital-ethmoidal</u> type of fracture.
When you initially start, foreshortening the human figure can be really challenging. You can use a variety of foreshortening strategies, such as spiral and geometric shape procedures. Additionally, we go over a four-step foreshortening method for figures that we strongly advise for novices.
A distortion that makes an image being viewed radiographically appear to have less depth. The image seems shorter than the item being studied in radiographic distortion, foreshortening excessive vertical angulation is the cause. This characteristic is seen when the apical area appears "rounded." But if echocardiography is done properly, the apical region ought to resemble a bullet.
To know more about foreshortening
brainly.com/question/2117561
#SPJ4
Answer:
Social influence model
Explanation:
The social influence model has its basis on the Social Learning Theory proposed by Bandura, which indicates that behavior comes from either positive or negative influences. Individuals that are part of the social sphere (such as parents and peers) and subjection to the media usually work as impact models, representing proper or improper behavior.
