a. The probability that a student goes to seek for minor clarification from the professor during office hours = 6%.
b. The probability that a student goes to the professor for major clarification = 14%.
Data and Calculations:
Percentage of students in the class who go to the professor to seek clarifications = 20% (a)
Percentage of students in the class who do not go to the professor to seek clarifications = 80% (100% - 20%) (b)
Percentage of (a) who seek minor clarification = 30%
Percentage of (a) who seek major clarification = 70%
Probability of (a) seeking minor clarification = 6% (20% x 30%)
Probability of (a) seeking major clarification = 14% (20% x 70%)
Thus, the probability of students seeking minor clarification is 6% while the probability of students seeking major clarification is 14%.
Learn more about probability at brainly.com/question/13604758
Answer:
1 billion
Explanation:
According to the World bank, about 1 billion people are malnourished around the world despite its efforts to reduce the rate of malnourishment in some lower-income nations. A larger percentage of this 1 billion malnourished people are in the Asian and Pacific continents; rather large percentage of about 60-65 percent.
I hope this helps.
Answer:
B) The Law of Demand
Explanation:
The correlation between the volume demanded, and the price of a good is explained by demand law. As per this law, price and the quantity demanded have an indirect or inverse relationship. An increase or decrease in price results in quantity demanded moving in the opposite direction.
Should the prices of a product or service increase, its demand falls.
Answer:
Exxon's response worsened its public standing.
Explanation:
Crisis management is the application of game plan to help an organization deal with a sudden and significant negative event.
The Exxon's response is a perfect example of how company should apply thoughtful response in crisis management because Exxon corporation failed to follow several well-established procedures thereby damaged its public standing, failed to seize control of developments after the spill and sending lower-ranking executive to address the situation instead of the chairman going there himself to take control of the situation in a possible way.
The action taken by Exxon led to the impression that the company disregard pollution problem by not involving top management.
